"Actors, dance acts give depth to 'Deep Blue Sea'" - by Andrew Hughes
You can also respond to Hughes and leave your own reviews on the South Bend Tribune Forum.
Thanks to Andrew Hughes and the South Bend Tribune for taking the time to come watch and respond to our show.
Overall a positive review of our performance, I think, though our performance is barely mentioned. Kyle and Michelle are lauded for having fine talents (can't agree more), and all of us for "making an entertaining show out of a weak script". He loses me when he says we saved it by adding a humorus delivery and choreography - as though those elements were unfounded in the script itself. The humor seems blatant to me in the text, and the idea of dance comes directly from the subtitle of the play itself. I refuse to take too much credit away from John Patrick Shanley on either count, though I am glad to hear that it worked for Hughes.
I have heard several people reference other performances of 'Danny' that felt more charicatured and less humorous, but I consider that a comment on those performances, not the script itself. You can do two-dimensional Shakespeare as easily as two-dimensional Shanley - And I've seen my share of both.
Besides a few other minor compliments and complaints, Andrew Hughes seems more interested in wishing we had reproduced a 1969 film about a dance marathon (based on a novel by Horace McCoy) than reviewing what we did do - which is a play called 'Danny and The Deep Blue Sea' by pulitzer winning playwright John Patrick Shanley.
His comment on cast sizes, as though larger casts are obviously better, strikes me as especially disconected from what we do here at New World or why we do it. There is an implication that play quality is determined by size and scope - really a goal more readily accomplished by film or novels than the stage, but not one I would consider fundamental to quality in any medium. That's a genre choice. Star Wars might have been better as a docudrama, if you like docudramas more than sci-fi movies, but that's not really a valid critique of the film as it is. Those are the types of theatrical assumptions that I personally, and as an Artistic Director of this organization, not only shy away from but try to challenge up-front with much of my/our work.
This is not to say Hughes' experience of our show is any less valid - certainly not. And I think his few compliments and critiques of the production itself are fair. What I'm wanting to point out is the different assumptions that we make in our work at NWA. I would love to have more freedom and opportunities to talk with reviewers and the press in general about our vision and goals, and hope that can happen in the future.
On a side note: I'd love to hear the actors respond to whether or not they "should have chosen to endure a little pain to preserve the atmosphere of the play". We must have done something wrong if those slaps aren't reading right - but I can guarantee the actors are feeling it afterwards. They hit each other (and not as soft as you might think) every time. And Kyle, I promise you, is going to town with that spanking.